WARKA Forum Index  
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

ዋርካ ቻት - በአማርኛ በቀጥታ ይወያዩ! Warka Live Chat | Home (New!) | About us | Contact us
ESAT የአበሾች Al Jazeera ሊሆን ይችላል ?
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    WARKA Forum Index -> Warka Politics - ዋርካ ፖለቲካ


 
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ግንቦት 7

ጀማሪ ኮትኳች


Joined: 08 Jan 2010
Posts: 96

PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 1:11 pm    Post subject: ESAT የአበሾች Al Jazeera ሊሆን ይችላል ? Reply with quote

http://addisnegeronline.com/2010/07/can-esat-be-our-al-jazeera/

Can ESAT Be Our Al Jazeera?
I am sure the owners of ESAT have thought seriously about the fantastic weapon they have built. They ought to be thanked by all Ethiopians who are eager to see a robust public sphere and alternative media in Ethiopia. Just before the start of the World Cup, the Spanish sports newspaper Marca had this amazing headline: Spain Are the Best in the World; Now Prove It. ESAT is a great idea; now prove it.

by Abiye Teklemariam | 21 Jul 2010

13 Comments


Print this page
The Al Jazeera Effect, a term made famous in academia by USC Political Scientist Philip Seib, is much used and abused. Avid readers of the Weekly Standard may think that it means the role of the Qatar based satellite channel in undermining Americas war on terror. In Israel, some media define it as the mainstreamization of anti-Semitic propaganda. For the rulers of Saudi Arabia, the Al Jazeera Effect is no better than the irresponsible secularization of the Arab public sphere. Seib, however, defines it as the superseding of the traditional media connections that have brought identity and structure to global politics by connectivity of new media, a rewiring of the worlds neural system. His term is primarily about alternative media, not a single satellite channel. Al Jazeera, as the doyen of the new media, represents their nature, characteristics, ethos and self-identification and definition.

Drawing on Seibs work, scholars of Arab media have studied the Al Jazeera Effect in the Arab world. Some were limited to the effects of Al Jazeera itself in creating a new era of political diversity in the Arab world. Others focused on the intensification of trends in media and politics in the Arab world that Al Jazeera started. Indeed, in the past few years, one can get a hard time finding any research in politics and media that doesnt mention Al Jazeera in one way or another. It is early days to know whether all the academic excitement is justified; the Al Jazeera Effect may prove to be as fleeting as the much touted CNN Effect of the early 1990s. Media effects are usually overhyped. Be it as it may though, there is no denying that Al Jazeera has brought something to the media scene (mainly broadcast) in the Arab world that was not a feature previously: a vast intake basin.

Since the 1950s, most broadcast outlets in the Arab world were controlled by either governments or groups that were too afraid or too acquiesced to criticize them. The very few channels, which were started by opposition groups here and there, were largely propaganda-sque in their approach. When it was launched in 1996, Al Jazeera defied this Arab tradition by acting as a soapbox of very diverse opinions and views in the Middle East. Media scholar Yochai Benkler calls this Universal Intake. The basic requirement of a public sphere is that it must in principle be susceptible to perceiving and considering the issues of anyone who believes that their condition is a matter appropriate for political consideration, Benkler argued in his highly impressive work The Wealth of Networks.

There are parallels between the developments of the public sphere in Ethiopia and the Arab world. Up until the 1990s, both print and broadcast media in both places were largely government owned. The short wave radio channels run by opposition groups- mostly from overseas were similar in style and approach to the outlets owned by governments. In 1990s, liberalization of the print media in Ethiopia and the shift of the pan-Arab press to London brought relative freedom to newspapers. But most of these newspapers concentrated on the politics rather than the political. What should have constituted as matters plausibly within the domain of political debate and action fell outside the intake basin of these newspapers, resulting in an impoverishment of the public sphere.

The end of the 1990s began the divergence of the two media spaces. Ethiopias has remained almost the same (give and take the extent of political freedom); the Arab media scene has gradually evolved into a genuine sphere of public participation. The Arab media sphere (part of the greater public sphere) is now a feast of breezy, passionate and substantive debates on anything ranging from the rights of minorities to the stagnation of economic growth in the region. What Al Jazeera had started, other TV stations and internet platforms in Egypt, Iraq and Lebanon have intensified. Call that the Al Jazeera Effect.

Will our first independent Satellite channel be able to do what Al Jazeera has done to the Arab media sphere? ESATs battles are harder. While Al jazeera started with lavish funding from an ambitious young emir who just overthrew his father in a bloodless coup, ESATs sources of funding are ordinary Ethiopians living in North America. What John Dewey called the problem of the public the difference between the public of theory and the public of practice in political science makes it hard to sustain the media let alone keep its quality high. Putting it in less academic terms, the task of consistently raising enough funds from the public is difficult. The public has slacker members who want to free ride; it has members who demand quantifiable success immediately; it has members who get tired of commitment quite easily; it also has cynical members who think nothing positive can come out of any political act. Another challenge is a determined effort by the government to jam the channel. Although many Arab countries floated the idea of jamming Al Jazeera, they were unable to do it before copycat stations mushroomed and made the jamming of Al Jazeera a useless exercise. This second problem has an effect on the first. The more ESAT staggers under government jamming, the more its funders get worn out a strategy quite accurately identified by the government.

Yet even working under these challenges, ESAT can still change our public sphere by taking a leaf out of Al Jazeeras book. Here are some points:

1.Robert Kaplan said Al Jazeera was endearing because it exuded hustle. Hustle in media means being constantly in the front; getting scoops, interviews, insightful analyses, hard-hitting debates. For ESAT, the shortage of footage can decrease the hustle factor, but it would not totally wipe it out because to some extent the medium becomes the message when there is a message overload. That is not the case in Ethiopia. People will switch on and follow ESATs breaking news even when it has no footage to back the story with.

2. What made Al Jazeera excellent, argued Roger Cohen, was its ability to bring the real world home. Many observers think Al Jazeera is a channel of politics. The truth is quite different: it is a political channel. A channel of politics is obsessed with who governs? The mainstay of its coverage is the duel between the opposition and the ruling party, political parties and politicians. A political channel filters and presents views and concerns that are held by sufficiently large number of people. Its mainstay is behaviours, cultures, institutions and interactions that ultimately become the focal point of the politics. Al Jazeera televises issues ranging from police brutality and gay rights in Egypt to corruption in Saudi Arabia. Sometimes it criticizes Arab governments, but it also knows that you can say a lot about, say, the Egyptian government just by presenting a story of police officers who tortured a minibus driver with impunity.

3.Back to Robert Kaplan. Al Jazeera, he said, excelled at opening ones mind because watching Al Jazeera is the vicarious equivalent of engaging in the kinds of different conversations one with a normal life would have. Al Jazeera does not involve in engaging continually in point scoring against one or another group. A TV channel like ESAT that beams to a country led by a fully authoritarian regime might be tempted to be just an anti-government propaganda instrument, but that would not help in getting credibility or relevance. ESAT will be best served if it can be a platform of live conversation among Ethiopians.

I am sure the owners of ESAT have thought seriously about the fantastic weapon they have built. They have to be thanked by all Ethiopians who are eager to see a robust public sphere and alternative media in Ethiopia. Just before the start of the World Cup, the Spanish sports newspaper Marca had this amazing headline: Spain Are the Best in the World; Now Prove It. ESAT is a great idea; now prove it.
This message expresses the views and opinions of the author and not necessarily those of CyberEthiopia, its staff or its affiliates. If you think this message is inappropriate or violates our rules and regulations , please notify the Administrators by clicking on the report button below.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Report post
ቢተወደድ

ዋና ውሃ አጠጪ


Joined: 21 Jul 2009
Posts: 1762
Location: Dabra Za`Yet

PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 4:45 pm    Post subject: Re: ESAT የአበሾች Al Jazeera ሊሆን ይችላል ? Reply with quote

ድንቄም አልጃዚራ Laughing Laughing Laughing

ግንቦት 7 እንደጻፈ(ች)ው:
http://addisnegeronline.com/2010/07/can-esat-be-our-al-jazeera/

Can ESAT Be Our Al Jazeera?
I am sure the owners of ESAT have thought seriously about the fantastic weapon they have built. They ought to be thanked by all Ethiopians who are eager to see a robust public sphere and alternative media in Ethiopia. Just before the start of the World Cup, the Spanish sports newspaper Marca had this amazing headline: Spain Are the Best in the World; Now Prove It. ESAT is a great idea; now prove it.

by Abiye Teklemariam
21 Jul 2010

13 Comments


Print this page
The Al Jazeera Effect, a term made famous in academia by USC Political Scientist Philip Seib, is much used and abused. Avid readers of the Weekly Standard may think that it means the role of the Qatar based satellite channel in undermining Americas war on terror. In Israel, some media define it as the mainstreamization of anti-Semitic propaganda. For the rulers of Saudi Arabia, the Al Jazeera Effect is no better than the irresponsible secularization of the Arab public sphere. Seib, however, defines it as the superseding of the traditional media connections that have brought identity and structure to global politics by connectivity of new media, a rewiring of the worlds neural system. His term is primarily about alternative media, not a single satellite channel. Al Jazeera, as the doyen of the new media, represents their nature, characteristics, ethos and self-identification and definition.

Drawing on Seibs work, scholars of Arab media have studied the Al Jazeera Effect in the Arab world. Some were limited to the effects of Al Jazeera itself in creating a new era of political diversity in the Arab world. Others focused on the intensification of trends in media and politics in the Arab world that Al Jazeera started. Indeed, in the past few years, one can get a hard time finding any research in politics and media that doesnt mention Al Jazeera in one way or another. It is early days to know whether all the academic excitement is justified; the Al Jazeera Effect may prove to be as fleeting as the much touted CNN Effect of the early 1990s. Media effects are usually overhyped. Be it as it may though, there is no denying that Al Jazeera has brought something to the media scene (mainly broadcast) in the Arab world that was not a feature previously: a vast intake basin.

Since the 1950s, most broadcast outlets in the Arab world were controlled by either governments or groups that were too afraid or too acquiesced to criticize them. The very few channels, which were started by opposition groups here and there, were largely propaganda-sque in their approach. When it was launched in 1996, Al Jazeera defied this Arab tradition by acting as a soapbox of very diverse opinions and views in the Middle East. Media scholar Yochai Benkler calls this Universal Intake. The basic requirement of a public sphere is that it must in principle be susceptible to perceiving and considering the issues of anyone who believes that their condition is a matter appropriate for political consideration, Benkler argued in his highly impressive work The Wealth of Networks.

There are parallels between the developments of the public sphere in Ethiopia and the Arab world. Up until the 1990s, both print and broadcast media in both places were largely government owned. The short wave radio channels run by opposition groups- mostly from overseas were similar in style and approach to the outlets owned by governments. In 1990s, liberalization of the print media in Ethiopia and the shift of the pan-Arab press to London brought relative freedom to newspapers. But most of these newspapers concentrated on the politics rather than the political. What should have constituted as matters plausibly within the domain of political debate and action fell outside the intake basin of these newspapers, resulting in an impoverishment of the public sphere.

The end of the 1990s began the divergence of the two media spaces. Ethiopias has remained almost the same (give and take the extent of political freedom); the Arab media scene has gradually evolved into a genuine sphere of public participation. The Arab media sphere (part of the greater public sphere) is now a feast of breezy, passionate and substantive debates on anything ranging from the rights of minorities to the stagnation of economic growth in the region. What Al Jazeera had started, other TV stations and internet platforms in Egypt, Iraq and Lebanon have intensified. Call that the Al Jazeera Effect.

Will our first independent Satellite channel be able to do what Al Jazeera has done to the Arab media sphere? ESATs battles are harder. While Al jazeera started with lavish funding from an ambitious young emir who just overthrew his father in a bloodless coup, ESATs sources of funding are ordinary Ethiopians living in North America. What John Dewey called the problem of the public the difference between the public of theory and the public of practice in political science makes it hard to sustain the media let alone keep its quality high. Putting it in less academic terms, the task of consistently raising enough funds from the public is difficult. The public has slacker members who want to free ride; it has members who demand quantifiable success immediately; it has members who get tired of commitment quite easily; it also has cynical members who think nothing positive can come out of any political act. Another challenge is a determined effort by the government to jam the channel. Although many Arab countries floated the idea of jamming Al Jazeera, they were unable to do it before copycat stations mushroomed and made the jamming of Al Jazeera a useless exercise. This second problem has an effect on the first. The more ESAT staggers under government jamming, the more its funders get worn out a strategy quite accurately identified by the government.

Yet even working under these challenges, ESAT can still change our public sphere by taking a leaf out of Al Jazeeras book. Here are some points:

1.Robert Kaplan said Al Jazeera was endearing because it exuded hustle. Hustle in media means being constantly in the front; getting scoops, interviews, insightful analyses, hard-hitting debates. For ESAT, the shortage of footage can decrease the hustle factor, but it would not totally wipe it out because to some extent the medium becomes the message when there is a message overload. That is not the case in Ethiopia. People will switch on and follow ESATs breaking news even when it has no footage to back the story with.

2. What made Al Jazeera excellent, argued Roger Cohen, was its ability to bring the real world home. Many observers think Al Jazeera is a channel of politics. The truth is quite different: it is a political channel. A channel of politics is obsessed with who governs? The mainstay of its coverage is the duel between the opposition and the ruling party, political parties and politicians. A political channel filters and presents views and concerns that are held by sufficiently large number of people. Its mainstay is behaviours, cultures, institutions and interactions that ultimately become the focal point of the politics. Al Jazeera televises issues ranging from police brutality and gay rights in Egypt to corruption in Saudi Arabia. Sometimes it criticizes Arab governments, but it also knows that you can say a lot about, say, the Egyptian government just by presenting a story of police officers who tortured a minibus driver with impunity.

3.Back to Robert Kaplan. Al Jazeera, he said, excelled at opening ones mind because watching Al Jazeera is the vicarious equivalent of engaging in the kinds of different conversations one with a normal life would have. Al Jazeera does not involve in engaging continually in point scoring against one or another group. A TV channel like ESAT that beams to a country led by a fully authoritarian regime might be tempted to be just an anti-government propaganda instrument, but that would not help in getting credibility or relevance. ESAT will be best served if it can be a platform of live conversation among Ethiopians.

I am sure the owners of ESAT have thought seriously about the fantastic weapon they have built. They have to be thanked by all Ethiopians who are eager to see a robust public sphere and alternative media in Ethiopia. Just before the start of the World Cup, the Spanish sports newspaper Marca had this amazing headline: Spain Are the Best in the World; Now Prove It. ESAT is a great idea; now prove it.

_________________
When we do it right No-one remembers,
When we do it wrong No-one forgets.
This message expresses the views and opinions of the author and not necessarily those of CyberEthiopia, its staff or its affiliates. If you think this message is inappropriate or violates our rules and regulations , please notify the Administrators by clicking on the report button below.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Report post
ውርጅብኝ

ጀማሪ ኮትኳች


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 98

PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 10:09 pm    Post subject: Re: ESAT የአበሾች Al Jazeera ሊሆን ይችላል ? Reply with quote

አበሾች ? Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes

ነፃነት ,ፍትህ ,ዴሞክራሲና አንድነት ?
why in that order ?
Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes

First and foremost agenda should be
አንድነት and ensuring the territorial integrity of Ethiopia


ግንቦት 7 እንደጻፈ(ች)ው:
http://addisnegeronline.com/2010/07/can-esat-be-our-al-jazeera/

Can ESAT Be Our Al Jazeera?
I am sure the owners of ESAT have thought seriously about the fantastic weapon they have built. They ought to be thanked by all Ethiopians who are eager to see a robust public sphere and alternative media in Ethiopia. Just before the start of the World Cup, the Spanish sports newspaper Marca had this amazing headline: Spain Are the Best in the World; Now Prove It. ESAT is a great idea; now prove it.

by Abiye Teklemariam
21 Jul 2010

13 Comments


Print this page
The Al Jazeera Effect, a term made famous in academia by USC Political Scientist Philip Seib, is much used and abused. Avid readers of the Weekly Standard may think that it means the role of the Qatar based satellite channel in undermining Americas war on terror. In Israel, some media define it as the mainstreamization of anti-Semitic propaganda. For the rulers of Saudi Arabia, the Al Jazeera Effect is no better than the irresponsible secularization of the Arab public sphere. Seib, however, defines it as the superseding of the traditional media connections that have brought identity and structure to global politics by connectivity of new media, a rewiring of the worlds neural system. His term is primarily about alternative media, not a single satellite channel. Al Jazeera, as the doyen of the new media, represents their nature, characteristics, ethos and self-identification and definition.

Drawing on Seibs work, scholars of Arab media have studied the Al Jazeera Effect in the Arab world. Some were limited to the effects of Al Jazeera itself in creating a new era of political diversity in the Arab world. Others focused on the intensification of trends in media and politics in the Arab world that Al Jazeera started. Indeed, in the past few years, one can get a hard time finding any research in politics and media that doesnt mention Al Jazeera in one way or another. It is early days to know whether all the academic excitement is justified; the Al Jazeera Effect may prove to be as fleeting as the much touted CNN Effect of the early 1990s. Media effects are usually overhyped. Be it as it may though, there is no denying that Al Jazeera has brought something to the media scene (mainly broadcast) in the Arab world that was not a feature previously: a vast intake basin.

Since the 1950s, most broadcast outlets in the Arab world were controlled by either governments or groups that were too afraid or too acquiesced to criticize them. The very few channels, which were started by opposition groups here and there, were largely propaganda-sque in their approach. When it was launched in 1996, Al Jazeera defied this Arab tradition by acting as a soapbox of very diverse opinions and views in the Middle East. Media scholar Yochai Benkler calls this Universal Intake. The basic requirement of a public sphere is that it must in principle be susceptible to perceiving and considering the issues of anyone who believes that their condition is a matter appropriate for political consideration, Benkler argued in his highly impressive work The Wealth of Networks.

There are parallels between the developments of the public sphere in Ethiopia and the Arab world. Up until the 1990s, both print and broadcast media in both places were largely government owned. The short wave radio channels run by opposition groups- mostly from overseas were similar in style and approach to the outlets owned by governments. In 1990s, liberalization of the print media in Ethiopia and the shift of the pan-Arab press to London brought relative freedom to newspapers. But most of these newspapers concentrated on the politics rather than the political. What should have constituted as matters plausibly within the domain of political debate and action fell outside the intake basin of these newspapers, resulting in an impoverishment of the public sphere.

The end of the 1990s began the divergence of the two media spaces. Ethiopias has remained almost the same (give and take the extent of political freedom); the Arab media scene has gradually evolved into a genuine sphere of public participation. The Arab media sphere (part of the greater public sphere) is now a feast of breezy, passionate and substantive debates on anything ranging from the rights of minorities to the stagnation of economic growth in the region. What Al Jazeera had started, other TV stations and internet platforms in Egypt, Iraq and Lebanon have intensified. Call that the Al Jazeera Effect.

Will our first independent Satellite channel be able to do what Al Jazeera has done to the Arab media sphere? ESATs battles are harder. While Al jazeera started with lavish funding from an ambitious young emir who just overthrew his father in a bloodless coup, ESATs sources of funding are ordinary Ethiopians living in North America. What John Dewey called the problem of the public the difference between the public of theory and the public of practice in political science makes it hard to sustain the media let alone keep its quality high. Putting it in less academic terms, the task of consistently raising enough funds from the public is difficult. The public has slacker members who want to free ride; it has members who demand quantifiable success immediately; it has members who get tired of commitment quite easily; it also has cynical members who think nothing positive can come out of any political act. Another challenge is a determined effort by the government to jam the channel. Although many Arab countries floated the idea of jamming Al Jazeera, they were unable to do it before copycat stations mushroomed and made the jamming of Al Jazeera a useless exercise. This second problem has an effect on the first. The more ESAT staggers under government jamming, the more its funders get worn out a strategy quite accurately identified by the government.

Yet even working under these challenges, ESAT can still change our public sphere by taking a leaf out of Al Jazeeras book. Here are some points:

1.Robert Kaplan said Al Jazeera was endearing because it exuded hustle. Hustle in media means being constantly in the front; getting scoops, interviews, insightful analyses, hard-hitting debates. For ESAT, the shortage of footage can decrease the hustle factor, but it would not totally wipe it out because to some extent the medium becomes the message when there is a message overload. That is not the case in Ethiopia. People will switch on and follow ESATs breaking news even when it has no footage to back the story with.

2. What made Al Jazeera excellent, argued Roger Cohen, was its ability to bring the real world home. Many observers think Al Jazeera is a channel of politics. The truth is quite different: it is a political channel. A channel of politics is obsessed with who governs? The mainstay of its coverage is the duel between the opposition and the ruling party, political parties and politicians. A political channel filters and presents views and concerns that are held by sufficiently large number of people. Its mainstay is behaviours, cultures, institutions and interactions that ultimately become the focal point of the politics. Al Jazeera televises issues ranging from police brutality and gay rights in Egypt to corruption in Saudi Arabia. Sometimes it criticizes Arab governments, but it also knows that you can say a lot about, say, the Egyptian government just by presenting a story of police officers who tortured a minibus driver with impunity.

3.Back to Robert Kaplan. Al Jazeera, he said, excelled at opening ones mind because watching Al Jazeera is the vicarious equivalent of engaging in the kinds of different conversations one with a normal life would have. Al Jazeera does not involve in engaging continually in point scoring against one or another group. A TV channel like ESAT that beams to a country led by a fully authoritarian regime might be tempted to be just an anti-government propaganda instrument, but that would not help in getting credibility or relevance. ESAT will be best served if it can be a platform of live conversation among Ethiopians.

I am sure the owners of ESAT have thought seriously about the fantastic weapon they have built. They have to be thanked by all Ethiopians who are eager to see a robust public sphere and alternative media in Ethiopia. Just before the start of the World Cup, the Spanish sports newspaper Marca had this amazing headline: Spain Are the Best in the World; Now Prove It. ESAT is a great idea; now prove it.
This message expresses the views and opinions of the author and not necessarily those of CyberEthiopia, its staff or its affiliates. If you think this message is inappropriate or violates our rules and regulations , please notify the Administrators by clicking on the report button below.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Report post
ውርጅብኝ

ጀማሪ ኮትኳች


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 98

PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ኢሳት ለሶስተኛ ጊዜ ታፈነች !
This message expresses the views and opinions of the author and not necessarily those of CyberEthiopia, its staff or its affiliates. If you think this message is inappropriate or violates our rules and regulations , please notify the Administrators by clicking on the report button below.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Report post
ተዓለም

ኮትኳች


Joined: 18 May 2010
Posts: 199

PostPosted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 4:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ውርጅብኝ እንደጻፈ(ች)ው:
ኢሳት ለሶስተኛ ጊዜ ታፈነች !


ገና የሞትዋ ዜና በራሷ አንደበት ትሰማለህ
This message expresses the views and opinions of the author and not necessarily those of CyberEthiopia, its staff or its affiliates. If you think this message is inappropriate or violates our rules and regulations , please notify the Administrators by clicking on the report button below.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Report post
ተድላ ሀይሉ

ዋና አለቃ


Joined: 17 Mar 2006
Posts: 4490
Location: ኢትዮጵያ

PostPosted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ሰላም ውድ ወገኖቼ :-

ሠሞኑን አዲስ የተቋቋመው የኢትዮጵያ ሣቴላይት ቴሌቪዥን ኔትወርክ (በቅፅል ስሙ ኢሣት ) በገጠመው ተደጋጋሚ የሞገድ መታፈን ችግር የተነሣ የተለያዩ አስተያዬቶች እየተደመጡ ነው :: እኒህን አስተያዬቶች ከእነምንጫቸው በማጣቀስ ማን ምን አቋም እንደያዘ እና ለምን ያንን አቋም እንደያዘ ለመተንተን እሞክራለሁ ::

ባለጉዳዮቹ :-
1 ..... ወያኔ እና ደጋፊዎቹ
2 ..... የይስሙላ የወያኔ ተቃዋሚዎች
3 ..... ኢትዮጵያውያን (በውጪ ሀገሮች )
4 .... ኢትዮጵያውያን (በአገር ውስጥ )

በእነዚህ ክፍሎች ለይቼ ለማዬት እሞክራለሁ ::

ተድላ
This message expresses the views and opinions of the author and not necessarily those of CyberEthiopia, its staff or its affiliates. If you think this message is inappropriate or violates our rules and regulations , please notify the Administrators by clicking on the report button below.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Report post
ተድላ ሀይሉ

ዋና አለቃ


Joined: 17 Mar 2006
Posts: 4490
Location: ኢትዮጵያ

PostPosted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 11:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ወያኔ እና ደጋፊዎቹ ለኢሣት ያላቸው አመለካከት
ወያኔዎች በቅርቡ ካደረጉት የምርጫ ትራዤዲ በኋላ በአገር ውስጥ ያላቸው ቁጥጥር ሙሉ በሙሉ የተሣካላቸው መስሎ ታይቷቸዋል :: ስለዚህ 1997 .. ጀምሮ በእቅድ ደረጃ 'የኮንስቲትዮንሲ ግንባታ ' በሚል በውጪ የሥለላ ተቋማቸው (ኤምባሲዎቻቸውን ማዕከል አድርገው ) የሚያካሂዱትን ሥራ ይበልጥ እያጠናከሩ እንዲመጡ አስችሏቸዋል :: በዚህ መካከል ኢሣት ብቅ ሲል ያልጠበቁት ዱብ ዕዳ ሆነባቸው :: ከራሣቸው የውስጥ ምንጮች የተገኙት መረጃዎች እንዳመለከቱት በኢሣት ምክንያት የወያኔው አምበል ለገሠ (መለስ ) በዕኩለ -ሌሊት አስቸኳይ የካቢኔ ስብሰባ እስከመጥራት ደርሷል :: ግን ለምን ?

በወያኔ የአገዛዝ ዘመን ሕዝብን በማንቃት ረገድ የነፃው ሚዲያ ጋዜጠኞች ከፍተኛ ሥራ ሠርተዋል : በመሥራትም ላይ ይገኛሉ :: እኒህ ጋዜጠኞች ለራሣቸውም ሆነ ለቤተሰባቸው ሕይወት እና ደህንነት ሣይሣሡ ከፍተኛ መስዋዕትነትን በመክፈል የሕዝብን ዕውነቱን የማወቅ መብት አስከብረዋል :: ነገር ግን ወያኔ በተደጋጋሚ በሚያደርስባቸው አፈና : እሥር : ግድያ እና ወከባ ምክንያት በተለይ የግል ጋዜጦችና መጽሔቶች ሙሉ በሙሉ በሚባል ሁኔታ በኢትዮጵያ ውስጥ ከህትመት ውጭ ሆነዋል :: እናስ 'ኢሣት ምን አመጣ ?' ያልን እንደሆነ ወያኔ በቅጥር ነፍሰ -ገዳዮቹ አማካይነት በቀጥታ ሊያቆመው የማይችል መርሃ -ግብር ዘርግተው ለሕዝብ ጆሮ ትኩስ የሆኑ መረጃዎችን ማድረሱን '' ብለው ጀመሩ :: ስለሆነም ወያኔ የራሱ የሣቴላይት ቴሌቪዥን ሥርጭት እስኪቋረጥ ድረስ ሞገድ እየለቀቀ የኢሣትን ሥርጭት ማወኩን ቀጠለ :: ነገር ግን ይህ የወያኔ ተግባር ራሱን ወያኔን የት ያደርሰው ይሆን ? ወደፊት እናያለን ::

በዚህ ዓምድ እና በሌሎች ዓምዶች የወያኔን አደንቋሪ ጩኸት የሚያስተጋቡት በአጋፋሪ ስልኪ የሚመራው በዋርካ የወያኔዎች ጋንታ እነ ቢትወደድ : ተዓለም : ጋንች እና መሠሎቻቸው ኢሣትን ለማጥላላት ያዙን : ልቀቁን የሚሉት ነገ አሣዳሪያቸው ቢፈነገል የሕልውናቸው መሠረት ከሥሩ እንድሚናድ ስለሚያውቁት ነው ::

ወጣም ወረደ ኢሣትም እንደገና ተጠናክሮ ይመጣል : ወያኔም በቁሙ መቅዘኑን ይቀጥላል ::

ተድላ
This message expresses the views and opinions of the author and not necessarily those of CyberEthiopia, its staff or its affiliates. If you think this message is inappropriate or violates our rules and regulations , please notify the Administrators by clicking on the report button below.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Report post
ትነት

ኮትኳች


Joined: 03 Jan 2010
Posts: 216

PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 12:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

እሚገርም ነው አንድ ወገናዊ ማለት ኢትዮጲያዊ ሀገሩን በተመለከተ በጎም ሆነ ክፉ ሲናገር : በተለይ በጎ ሲናገር ባሁኑ ሰዓት እሚያየውን በቀጥታ ወያኔ ነው :: እሚባለው በተቃዋሚም ሆነ በኢትዮጶኢያ ደጋፊ አስመሳዮች (ሸአቢያዎች ) ዘንዳ ;: በረግጥ ሸአቢያዎች : የራሳቹ ጉዳይ እንጦሮጦስም ይግቡ :: ግን በትክክል ኢትዮጲያዊነት እሚሰማው : ለምን እንዴት ከየት ወዴት እስከመቼ እሚለው ጥያቄ :: ይመለከታቸዋል ::

በእውነት አገራችን ነጮች ስደት ሲያምራቸው እንዳይመጡ እንሻለንን ? ማንም ገዛን ማንም የወደፊት አላማችን የማንም የበታች ረሀብተኞች ሆነን ላለመገኘት ከሆነ : ማንም ወገኔ ቢያስተዳድራት ቅር ሊለን ይሆንን ?

እባካችሁን ለኛ ከኛ ውጭ እሚቆረቆርልን ይኖርን ? ከፈጣሪ ውጭ :

እባካቹ ይህ የዘመኑ ደርቲ ጌም ያላጎሳቆላቹ ወገኖቼ በጥሞና እዩትና እንረዳዳ : ከኛ ውጭ ለኛ ማንም :
This message expresses the views and opinions of the author and not necessarily those of CyberEthiopia, its staff or its affiliates. If you think this message is inappropriate or violates our rules and regulations , please notify the Administrators by clicking on the report button below.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Report post
ጋንች

ውሃ አጠጪ


Joined: 28 Dec 2007
Posts: 1016

PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 12:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ተድላ ሀይሉ

ዳይፐርህ ላይ የቀዘንከውን ቅዘን ለናትህ ነግረሀት ትጥረግልህ

በቁምህ ቅዘንህን አዝለህ ሰው ፊት አትቅረብ Embarassed Laughing
This message expresses the views and opinions of the author and not necessarily those of CyberEthiopia, its staff or its affiliates. If you think this message is inappropriate or violates our rules and regulations , please notify the Administrators by clicking on the report button below.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Report post
ተድላ ሀይሉ

ዋና አለቃ


Joined: 17 Mar 2006
Posts: 4490
Location: ኢትዮጵያ

PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 9:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

2 ..... የይስሙላ የወያኔ ተቃዋሚዎች
ወያኔ ራሱ እና ደጋፊዎቹ በአምሣላቸው የፈጠሯቸው የይስሙላ ተቃዋሚዎች አሏቸው :: እኒህ አስመሣዮች ከወያኔ ይበልጥ በኢትዮጵያ ሕዝብ ላይ ላለፉት 19 + ዓመቶች ቀልደዋል : አሁንም ከተፈቀደላቸው ማፌዙን ይቀጥላሉ :: እኒህ አስመሣይ ተቃዋሚዎች በወያኔ 'ሕጋዊና ሰላማዊ ትግል ' ሥልት ያመኑና የተጠመቁ መሆናቸውን ዘወትር የሚለፍፉ ናቸው :: በተግባር ግን የወያኔ የማደናገሪያ ፕሮፓጋንዳ ማሠራጫዎች ከመሆን ያለፈ ተግባር አይፈፅሙም ::

በኢትዮጵያ ውስጥ የነበሩ የግል የነፃው ፕሬስ ጋዜጦች እኒህን ሃሣይ -መሲሆች ሲያጋልጡ ኖረዋል :: አሁን ግን እኒያ የፕሬስ ውጤቶች በወያኔ የግፍ በትር ወድቆባቸው ሙሉ በሙሉ በሚባል ሁኔታ ተዘግተዋል :: እኒህ አስመሣይ ተቃዋሚዎች ዘወትር ሽፋን የሚያደርጉት ትክክለኛ ሰላማዊ ትግል እናደርጋለን ብለው ቆርጠው የተነሡትን ኢትዮጵያውያን ነው :: መመሣሠሉን እንደ ኤድስ ቫይረስ ስለተካኑበት ማን ዕውነተኛ የሰላማዊ ትግል ሐዋርያ : ማን ደግሞ አባይ -የሰላማዊ ትግል ታጋይ መሆኑን ለመለየት የግድ በየወቅቱ የተከሠቱትን የትግል ቀውሶች ማጤኑ የግድ ነው ::

በእኒህ አስመሣይ ተቃዋሚዎች ጎራ የልደቱ ኢዴፓ : የአቶ ሣህሌ (ስዬ ) መድረክ : የአቶ ገብሩ አሥራት አረና : እና የመሣሠሉት ድርጅቶች መሪዎች ይጠቃለላሉ :: አሁን እንደሚታየው በደጋፊዎቻቸው በእነ 'ሓየት 11' ዓይነቶቹ የሚሠማው 'ኢሣት እንኳን ታፈነ ' ጩኸት ከተወሰኑ ቀናት በኋላ እነርሱው ራሣቸው የየድርጅቶቹ መሪዎች ተቀላቅለው ኢሣትን ማውገዝ ይጀምራሉ :: ምክንያት :- ሕዝብ ሃቁን ካወቀ እንደወያኔ ሙሉ በሙሉ አሽቀንጥሮ እንደሚጥላቸው ስለሚያውቁ ::

ተድላ
This message expresses the views and opinions of the author and not necessarily those of CyberEthiopia, its staff or its affiliates. If you think this message is inappropriate or violates our rules and regulations , please notify the Administrators by clicking on the report button below.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Report post
ተድላ ሀይሉ

ዋና አለቃ


Joined: 17 Mar 2006
Posts: 4490
Location: ኢትዮጵያ

PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 10:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ሰላም ውድ ወገኖቼ :-

ወያኔ እና የይስሙላ ተቃዋሚዎች እንዴት እንደሚደጋገፉ ዘመን የማይሽረው ወያኔ አማረ አረጋዊ ባለፈው ለኢሣት ቃለ -መጠይቅ ሲሠጥ ካሣየው ትዕቢት በተጨማሪ በጋዜጠኛው ፋሲል የእኔዓለም ላይ ስልክ በመዝጋት አሣይቷል :: ትላንት እሑድ ሐምሌ 25 ቀን 2002 .. ደግሞ አማረ ከዚያም ከዚያም ለቃቅሞ ስለኢሣት ሥርጭት መቋረጥ አንድ ዘገባ አቋርጧል :: አስመሣዮች ምንጊዜም ቢሆን በወያኔ ሣይታዘሉ የትም እንደማይደርሱ ስለሚያምኑ በቀጥታም ሆነ በተዘዋዋሪ የወያኔ ዓላማ አስፈጻሚዎች ሆነው ይቀርባሉ ::

Quote:
ኢሳት በኢትዮጵያ መንግሥት ታፈንኩ አለ

"ኢሳት ችግሩን በሌሎች ላይ በመለጠፉ የሚያገኘው ትርፍ የለም " አቶ ሽመልስ ከማል

(በኃይሌ ሙሉ )

የኢትዮጵያ ሳተላይት ቴሌቪዥን (ኢሳት ) የኢትዮጵያ መንግሥት ባካሄደበት አፈና (jamming) ምክንያት ለሦስትኛ ጊዜ ሥርጭቱ መቋረጡን አስታወቀ፡፡ የመንግሥት ኮሙኒኬሽን ጉዳዮች ጽሕፈት ቤት በበኩሉ ኢሳት የውስጥ ችግሩን በሌሎች ላይ እየለጠፈ መሆኑን ገልጿል፡፡

መቀመጫውን አምስተርዳም ያደረገው ኢሳት በድረ ገጹ ላይ ባወጣው መግለጫ እንዳስታወቀው፣ ለሥርጭቱ መቋረጥ የኢትዮጵያ መንግሥት ተጠያቂ ነው፡፡

"ኢሳት የኢትዮጵያ፣ የመካከለኛው ምሥራቅና የአውሮፓ ሥርጭት ተቋርጧል፡፡ ኢሳት አገልግሎት መስጠት ከጀመረበት ከግንቦት ወር ጀምሮ ሥርጭቱ ሲቋረጥ ይህ ለሦስተኛ ጊዜ መሆኑ ነው፤ " ሲል ባወጣው መግለጫ ያስታወቀው ኢሳት፣ የኢትዮጵያ መንግሥት በሳተላይት ቢዝነስ ከተሰማሩ አካላት ጋር በመሆን በሕገወጥ መንገድ የኢሳትን ሥርጭት ለማቋረጥ ሙከራ ስለማድረጉ የሚያስረዱ መረጃዎችን ያገኘ መሆኑን አስታውቋል፡፡

"ሕገወጡ የሥርጭት ዕውክታ መነሻ የኢትዮጵያ መንግሥት መሆኑን መረጃችን ይጠቁማል፡፡ ከሐምሌ 13 ቀን 2002 .. ጀምሮ የኢሳትን ሲግናል የሚሸከመው የሳተላይት ሲስተም ጠንካራና ተከታታይ በሆነ የሬዲዮ ፍሪኩዌንሲ ዕውክታ ሲደበደብ ቆይቷል፤ " ይላል የኢሳት መግለጫ፡፡

ተከታታዩን የፍሪኩዌንሲ ድብደባ ተከትሎ ከኢሳት በተጨማሪ መንግሥት የሚቆጣጠረው የኢትዮጵያ ቴሌቪዥን ጣቢያ የሳተላይት አገልግሎት ከአየር ላይ መጥፋቱን መግለጫው ጠቁሟል፡፡ "ኢሳት ለሁለተኛ ጊዜ ተቋርጦ እንደገና አገልግሎት መስጠት ሲጀምር የኢሳት ፍሪኩዌንሲ የኢትዮጵያ ቴሌቪዥን አገልግሎት ከሚሰጥበት ፍሪኩዌንሲ ጋር ተመሳሳይ እንዲሆን በኢሳት በኩል ለሳተላይት ጣቢያው ጥያቄ በመቅረቡ፣ ኢሳትና ኢቲቪ በተመሳሳይ ፍሪኩዌንሲ በአየር ላይ እንዲውሉ ተደርጐ ነበር፡፡ ይህ በመሆኑም የኢሳትን ሲግናል የሚያውክ ማንኛውም ጣልቃ ገብ ፍሪኩዌንሲ በኢትዮጵያ ቴሌቪዥን ሥርጭት ላይ ችግር ማስከተሉ የማይቀር ነው፡፡ ለዚህም ነው ኢሳትን ከአየር ውጭ ለማድረግ የሞከረው የኢትዮጵያ መንግሥት የራሱንም ጣቢያ ከአየር ውጪ ያደረገው፤ " በማለት ኢሳትና ኢቲቪ በአንድ ቀን የተቋረጡበትን ምክንያት ያስረዳል፡፡

በኢትዮጵያ መንግሥት አፈና እየተደረገበት መሆኑን የጠቆመው ኢሳት፣ ማንኛውም ዓይነት ሕጋዊና የቴክኖሎጂ ዘዴዎችን በመጠቀም የሳተላይት ሥርጭቱን የሚቀጥልበትን መንገድ እንደሚፈልግ አስታውቋል፡፡

በጉዳዩ ላይ ያነጋገርናቸው የመንግሥት ኮሙኒኬሽን ጉዳዮች ጽሕፈት ቤት ምክትል ኃላፊ አቶ ሽመልስ ከማል በበኩላቸው፣ ኢሳት ታዳሚዎቼ ናቸው ለሚላቸው ክፍሎች "የገንዘብ ዕርዳታ ካላደረጋችሁልኝ በኪሳራ መውጣቴ ነው፤ " በማለት ተደጋጋሚ ጥሪ ሲያሰማ መቆየቱን ጠቁመው፣ ድርጅቱ የራሱን የውስጥ ችግር ወደ ሌሎች ክፍሎች ለማሸጋገር መሞከሩ "የእናቴ መቀነት አደናቀፈኝ ዓይነት " ሰንካላ ምክንያት ማቅረቡን ተናግረዋል፡፡ ይህንን በማድረጉም የሚያገኘው ትርፍ የለም ብለዋል፡፡

አቶ ሽመልስ እንዳሉት፣ በተለያዩ ምክንያቶች አየር ላይ ሲወጣና ሲወርድ የቆየ ድርጅት የውስጥ ድክመቱን በሌሎች ክፍሎች ላይ በመለጠፍና በማሳበብ የሚያገኘው ትርፍ አይኖርም፡፡ የኢሳት መስራቾች ከዚህ ቀደም የሬዲዮ ጣቢያና የቴሌቪዥን ጣቢያዎች ለማቋቋም ሞክረው ያቋቋሟቸው ድርጅቶች አድማጭ አጥተው አንድ ስንዝር መራመድ አቅቷቸውና ከስረው የተዘጉባቸው መሆኑን የጠቆሙት አቶ ሽመልስ፣ አሁንም "በኢትዮጵያ መንግሥት ታፈንኩኝ " የሚለው ኢሳት፣ በራሱ የውስጥ ችግር የተዘፈቀና የተተበተበ በመሆኑ የትም ሊደርስ እንደማይችል ገልጸዋል፡፡

የኢሳትና የኢትዮጵያ ቴሌቪዥን ሥርጭቶች በአንድ ቀን አንድ ላይ እንዴት ሊጠፉ ቻሉ ? በሚል ለቀረበላቸው ጥያቄ አቶ ሽመልስ ሲመልሱ፣ "የኢትዮጵያ ቴሌቪዥን የሳተላይት ሥርጭት የተቋረጠው ለጊዜው በተፈጠረ የቴክኒክ ችግር ነው፡፡ ይህንን ችግር ለመፍታትም ከአረብ ሳት ኃላፊዎች ጋር ንግግር እየተደረገ ነው፡፡ ችግሩ በቅርቡ መፍትሔ ያገኛል የሚል ዕምነት አለን፤ " ብለዋል፡፡

ኃይሌ ሙሉ : እሑድ ሐምሌ 25 ቀን 2002 .. : ሪፖርተር ጋዜጣ :: ኢሳት በኢትዮጵያ መንግሥት ታፈንኩ አለ ::

የወያኔው ቃለአቀባይ በተዘዋዋሪ እንዳመነው የኢሣትን ሥርጭት ለማወክ ሲል ወያኔ የራሱን የቴሌቪዢን ሥርጭት ማዳፈኑን ነው ::

ተድላ
This message expresses the views and opinions of the author and not necessarily those of CyberEthiopia, its staff or its affiliates. If you think this message is inappropriate or violates our rules and regulations , please notify the Administrators by clicking on the report button below.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Report post
ሓየት 11

ዋና አለቃ


Joined: 06 Apr 2008
Posts: 2792
Location: ላን'ሊይ

PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ተድላ ሃይሉ

ከየትኛው ጎራ እንደሆንክ ራስህን ግልጽ አድርገህ የማታውቅ ሰው ... ሁሌም ወደ ነፈሰበት ... ራስህን ቤዛ ኩሉ አድርገህ ስታበቃ ሌሎችን ጥላሸት መቀባት የእድሜ ልክ ልምድ ይመስላል :: ግን ምን ነክቶህ ላንዲት ደቂቃ እንኳን ሰከን ብለህ ለማሰብ የማትሞክረው Question ዘላለም ዓለምክን ውሃ ወቀጣ ... ከንቱ ልፋት ... ምን እርባና ይኖረው ይሆን Question

እሺ ይሁንልህ እንበልና አስመሳይ ያልካቸው ፓርቲዎች "ናቸው " ብለን እንቀበልህና ማን ነው እውነተኛው ተቃዋሚ Question እውነተኛ ተቃዋሚ ማለትስ ምን ማለት ይሆን ላንተ Question እስኪ ሁሌም የሌሎችን መልካም ስራ ለማደናቀፍ ደፋ ቀና የምትሉ "ሰዎች " እውነተኛ ተቃዋሚ ነው ... ከሌሎቹ የተሻለ ነው የምትሉትንም አያይዛችሁ ጫር እያደረጋችሁ ሂዱ .... አሊያም ጫሩ Exclamation Exclamation Idea

ኢሳት በኔ እይታ ሚድያ ነው :: ሞር ለስ :: እንደሚድያ ደግሞ ከማንም መወገን የለበትም :: ለህዝብም ወግኖ ሊቆም አይገባም :: ሊቆምለት የሚገባው ዋና ነጥብ ቢኖር "ለእውነት " ነው :: ለእውነት እስከቆመ ድረስ እውነትን ለሚፈሯት : እንደ እግር እሳት ለምትለበልባቸው ብቻ ኢሳት አይመለከታቸውም ይሆናል እንጂ ማንኛውም ኢትዮጵያዊ የሚመለከተው ነው :: ተድላ ዛሬ ያንተን 24/7 ጥላቻና ሮሮ ብቻ የሚያስተጋባ መስሎህ ከጎንህ የተሰልፈ ወይም ከጎኑ የተሰለፍክ ይምሰልህ ዋት ኤቨር ... አንተ ተቆርቋሪ ሌላው አጭበርባሪ የምትልበት ምክንያት ሊኖር አይችልም ::

እኔ በተደጋጋሚ ስጋቴን አስቀምጫለሁ :: ለኢትዮጵያ የሚበጅ ስራ መስራት ከፈለገ ሚድያ ...ዓላማውም ቪዥኑም ምኑም እውነትና እውነት ብቻ መሆን ይኖርበታል :: ሚድያ ከወያኔ ሚድያዎች የተሻለ ነገር ሊሰራ ይጠበቅበታል :: የወያኔ ሚድያዎች የራሱን ዓላማ ብቻ ለማስተጋባትና ህዝቡን ለመጫን 24 ሰዓት ሙሉ ፕሮፖጋንዳውን ሲነፋበት ውሎ የሚያድር : የሱን አመለካከት የማይጋሩ እንደ ጠላት የሚያስነግርበት ሚድያ ነው :: በዛው ልክ ደግሞ ተሳክቶለታል ለማለት በሚያስደፍር መልኩ የዘራው የዘር እሾህ የእያንዳንድችንን ልብ እየወጋ እርስ በርስ እንደተፈራራን እስካሁኗ ደቂቃ ድረስ እንድንኖር አስችሎታል :: ኢሳትም ማንም ያቆቁመው ማንም የራሱን ዓላማ ለማስረጽ ብቻ የሚያውል ከሆነ ወይም ከአንድ የተመረጠ ተቃዋሚው ጎራ ብቻ ወግኖ ሲለፍፍ ውሎ ቢያድር የሚፈይደው አንዳች ቁም ነገር አይኖርም :: ጥፋትን እንጂ :: ትርፍ ፈልጎ ይክፈተው ወይም ለኢትዮጵያ ህልውና ብሎ እውነትን እስካላስተጋባ ድረስ ወይ በራሱ ጊዜ ይዘጋል ወይ የማያባራ ሰደድ እሳት ለቆብን ይቀራል :: ለእውነት እቆማለሁ እስካለ ድረስ ከጣፋጭ ፍሬውም ከጎምዛዛውም የምንቋደሰው ሁላችንም መሆን አለብን :: ያኔ ታድያ አንተና ያንተ ጎራም ሆኑ እኔና የእኔዎቹ ጎራ ከኢሳት ጎን ቆመን እንዝለቅ : መሃል ላይ እናፈንግጥ ሁላችንም እኩል ቻንስ አለን Exclamation ኢሳት እውነት እሰክሆነ ድረስ :: ክፋቱ አንተና መሰሎችህ ፍጹማዊያን ሌላው የዛገ ጭንቅላት ባለቤት ነው የሚመስልህ እንጂ ::

ለእወነት ከመቆም በተጎዳኝ ኢሳት ሊኖረው የሚገባ ኳሊቲ ሁሉንም ማዳረስ ብቻ ሳይሆን ሁሉም ላይ መድረስም ጭምር ነው :: እውነት በአንድ ወገን ብቻ መሽጋ የምትገኝ ንብረት አይደለችም :: ለአገር ቤዛ ነኝ ; ከኔ በላይ ተቃዋሚ ላሳር ነው ; ከኛ በላይ አዋቂ ለእብደት ነው ... ወዘተ የሚሉትንም መዳሰስ ይኖርበታል :: ያንዱን ፍላጎት በሌላው ላይ ለመጫን ሲባል ብቻ የራስን ጉድፍ ሸፋፍኖ ወያኔ -መድረክ : ኢዴፓ -ዓረና ወዘተ ማለት ብቻ ተገቢ አይሆንም :: .የኢሳት ዓይን ሁሉንም በእኩልነት የሚያይ መሆን አለበት :: ሁሉንም ፓርቲና አመራር እኩል ፈትሾ ... ለህዝብ ማቅረብ አለበት :: ህዝቡንም ፈትሾ መልሶ ሊያስተጋባለት ይገባል :: በእያንዳንዳችን ማጀት ውስጥ ስር የሰደደ በሽታ ሳይኖር አይቀርምና ኢትዮጵያን ማዳን ከዛ ይጀምራል ::


ሓየት - እውነትን ፈርቶ ያማያውቀው Exclamation Exclamation
_________________
An eye for an eye, and the whole world would be blind. (KGK)
>>>>>>>>> ገዛ ሓየት
This message expresses the views and opinions of the author and not necessarily those of CyberEthiopia, its staff or its affiliates. If you think this message is inappropriate or violates our rules and regulations , please notify the Administrators by clicking on the report button below.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Report post
ተድላ ሀይሉ

ዋና አለቃ


Joined: 17 Mar 2006
Posts: 4490
Location: ኢትዮጵያ

PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 1:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ሓየት 11 እንደጻፈ(ች)ው:
ተድላ ሃይሉ

... ኢሳት በኔ እይታ ሚድያ ነው :: ሞር ለስ :: እንደሚድያ ደግሞ ከማንም መወገን የለበትም :: ለህዝብም ወግኖ ሊቆም አይገባም :: ሊቆምለት የሚገባው ዋና ነጥብ ቢኖር "ለእውነት " ነው :: ለእውነት እስከቆመ ድረስ እውነትን ለሚፈሯት : እንደ እግር እሳት ለምትለበልባቸው ብቻ ኢሳት አይመለከታቸውም ይሆናል እንጂ ማንኛውም ኢትዮጵያዊ የሚመለከተው ነው ::
ሓየት - እውነትን ፈርቶ ያማያውቀው Exclamation Exclamation


ተመልከቱ ምልስ ወያኔዎች እንዴት እንደሚያስቡ Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes ከሕዝብ የተሠወረ ዕውነት የማን ዕውነት ነው ? የጥቂት ምርጥ ወርቅ ዘሮች ዕውነት ?

ከዚህ በፊት ሓየት 11 በተመሣሣይ ሁኔታ በሌላ ዓምድ ላይ የሠጠውን አስተያዬት ተመልከቱት ::

ምንጭ :- ዋርካ ፖለቲካ :: ኢሳት አማረ አረጋዊን ኮረንቲ አስጨበጠው

ሓየት 11 እንደጻፈ(ች)ው:
በተጨማሪም ! የወያኔን ሚዲያ እንዳይተካ እሰጋለሁ :: ማለቴ ባላንሱን ያጣ ... ፕሮፖጋንዳ ብቻ የሚለፈፍበት እንዳይሆን ... የተቃዋሚዎችን ችግርም በግልጽ ፈልፍሎ ለህዝብ ማቅረብ አለበት :: አማረ የተናገረው አንድ የማይካድ ሃቅ "በተለይ በዳያስፖራ አካባቢ ያሉ ፖለቲከኞች ሂስ የሚባል ነገር አይዋጥላቸውም :: ትችትን እንዳመጣጡ በመመከት ፋንታ ...ፍረጃ ያበዛሉ ::" ይሄ መስተካከል አለበት :: አለበለዚያ ኢሳት ሊፈጥረው የሚችል እሳት ከቁጥጥር ውጪ እንዳይሆን እሰጋለሁ Idea Idea Idea


ሓየት

የሓየት 11 ዓይነቶቹ አስመሣይ የወያኔ ተቃዋሚ ነን ባዮች ሥጋታቸው ኢሣት የሕዝብ ልሣን ሆኖ ወያኔን እና አስመሣይ ተቃዋሚዎችን መግቢያ መውጫ እንዳያሣጣቸው ነው ::

ተድላ
This message expresses the views and opinions of the author and not necessarily those of CyberEthiopia, its staff or its affiliates. If you think this message is inappropriate or violates our rules and regulations , please notify the Administrators by clicking on the report button below.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Report post
ሓየት 11

ዋና አለቃ


Joined: 06 Apr 2008
Posts: 2792
Location: ላን'ሊይ

PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 2:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ተድላ

ባናት ባናትህ እውነት ላዝንብብህና .... ነጋ ጠባ ጠብ ላይል ንትርክ በጣም ስላገሸገሸኝ ... በኔና ባንተ መካከል ያለውን ልዩነት አሳጥሬ ነግሬህ ልውጣ

ልዩነታችን የአስመሳይ ወይም ታማኝ ተቃዋሚነት አይደለም :: ልዩነታችን አንተ የትላንት እኔ የነገ ውጤት መሆናችን ነው :: Idea Idea Idea Exclamation


ሓየት ... ፍሮም ፊዩቸር Exclamation
_________________
An eye for an eye, and the whole world would be blind. (KGK)
>>>>>>>>> ገዛ ሓየት
This message expresses the views and opinions of the author and not necessarily those of CyberEthiopia, its staff or its affiliates. If you think this message is inappropriate or violates our rules and regulations , please notify the Administrators by clicking on the report button below.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Report post
ተድላ ሀይሉ

ዋና አለቃ


Joined: 17 Mar 2006
Posts: 4490
Location: ኢትዮጵያ

PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 2:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ሓየት 11 እንደጻፈ(ች)ው:
ተድላ

ባናት ባናትህ እውነት ላዝንብብህና .... ነጋ ጠባ ጠብ ላይል ንትርክ በጣም ስላገሸገሸኝ ... በኔና ባንተ መካከል ያለውን ልዩነት አሳጥሬ ነግሬህ ልውጣ

ልዩነታችን የአስመሳይ ወይም ታማኝ ተቃዋሚነት አይደለም :: ልዩነታችን አንተ የትላንት እኔ የነገ ውጤት መሆናችን ነው :: Idea Idea Idea Exclamation


ሓየት ... ፍሮም ፊዩቸር Exclamation


በምን ሥሌት ነው ጊዜ ሲቆጠር ትላንት ሣይኖር ነገ ብቻ የሚኖረው ? ራሥህን በቅዠት ዓለም ውስጥ የነከርህ ብኩን :: እኔ ለአንተ አፈርኩልህ Embarassed Embarassed Embarassed

ለአንተ እንደፈለገህ : ትላንትን እና ዛሬን ሣትኖር ለነገ ለመኖር ለምትዳዳው :: እኔ ግን በምድር ላይ ከተፈጠርሁበት ቅፅበት ጀምሮ በሕይወት አለሁ : ለወደፊቱም ፈጣሪ እግዚአብሔር እስከፈቀደልኝ ድረስ እኖራለሁ :: በዚህ ሂደት እኔም ከአካባቢዬ ጋር እየተለወጥሁ መምጣቴን አምናለሁ :: ዕንጉዳይ አይደለሁም ድንገት ነገ ብቅ የምለው ::

አሁንም ከኢሣት እና አጋር የነፃው ሚዲያ ጋር ወደፊት Exclamation Exclamation Exclamation

ተድላ
This message expresses the views and opinions of the author and not necessarily those of CyberEthiopia, its staff or its affiliates. If you think this message is inappropriate or violates our rules and regulations , please notify the Administrators by clicking on the report button below.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Report post
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    WARKA Forum Index -> Warka Politics - ዋርካ ፖለቲካ All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Page 1 of 7

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Provided by CyberEthiopia.com , powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group , Original Amharic translation by Ethiopic Open Source Translation modified by CyberEthiopia